Last fall, knowing we were coming up on a decade of marriage, Jon and I decided to read a book together about relationships. We did this a lot when we were first married and hadn't in several years, and we're both firm believers in taking time to strengthen your relationship even when it doesn't "need" it - or you'll be scrambling when it is. So we started looking for a book from a Christian egalitarian perspective.*Jon emailed me one day when he saw a list complied by Christians for Biblical Equality of books that they recommended, and we quickly purchased a copy of one that looked appealing and eagerly began reading it when the Amazon box arrived.We didn't even finish it. It was thatbad.It WAS good for our marriage, having a shared experience over a book that we could, frankly, make fun of - but it wasn't exactly a book we would recommend to others. We chalked it up to an expanding market that no one had reached yet, and continued on our merry way.But that experience has bothered me ever since. Why aren't there more books about this? It certainly isn't because all egalitarian marriages are perfect, and it certainly isn't because complementarianism is the one "right" model of Christian marriage.In reading about this over the last few years, it seems to me there are some myths about egalitarian marriage. I'll admit that I had some... before I entered one. I will address some thoughts about what egalitarian marriage is another time, but for now I thought I'd start with what egalitarian marriage is not. The caveat here is that of course there will be anecdotal evidence against every single thing I say. Of course I am not speaking for all egalitarian marriages in all places and in all times for all eternity. What follows is my experience.MYTH: Egalitarian marriage is inherently individualistic.I used to think that people in egalitarian marriages basically cohabited and barely cared about their partner: "She lives her life; he lives his!" Egalitarian marriages are not necessarily loveless! And neither does one person have to settle or compromise everything they dream of in order for the other to succeed. Decisions don't need to be made entirely independent of each other, and neither are decisions always either/or - with one partner always getting their way and the other always giving in.MYTH: Egalitarian marriage is defined by the wife having a job.Some couples hold very traditional views of gender roles in marriage, and the wife works. Other couples are very egalitarian, though - because of season of life, personal opportunities, or personal choice - the man is still the "breadwinner." Egalitarian is not code word for "women working outside the home."MYTH: Egalitarian marriage is inherently comprised of man-hating feminists.The misconceptions about feminism are beyond the scope of what I'm saying here, but it's important to note that not all women in egalitarian relationships hate men. In fact, I know a lot of people in egalitarian marriages. And - gasp! - none of them hate men. None of them think that men are stupid or should categorically be blamed for All The Things. To claim that because a woman desires equal treatment, respect, and opportunities means that she hates men is absolutely false.One other note here: To say that women are equal does not mean that one denies biological and anatomical differences between men and women. I have often heard complementarians say that egalitarians claim this, but I have never actually heard an egalitarian claim this. It's a bit ridiculous.MYTH: Egalitarian marriage is only good for women.Men seem to like it too. At least the ones I know do. It is freeing for women to not be bound by patriarchal ideals of womanhood, and it is just as freeing for men to not be bound by patriarchal ideals of manhood. There is a great burden falsely placed on men in these patriarchal systems, and it is as unfair - and potentially damaging - to the men as it is the women.As I write this, I'm sitting by a fire with my husband of nearly-ten-years. I read to him various drafts of this post, he'd nod in agreement with certain phrases and sentences, and offer suggestions about others. I'd edit and emerge with something new. Better. Different, but slightly. Mostly my words, some his, though all nearly indistinguishable from each other. Each sentence constructed from shared experiences and a conflation of our perspectives... as is every day of our lives.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*Simply put, egalitarianism is the belief that men and women are completely equal and that personhood and roles are not dependent on gender. Complementarianism maintains that men and women "compliment" each other and are unique in roles and should act according to those roles to be pleasing to God. I'll be quick to note that many complementarians do not intentionally use this as a tool to oppress women and would claim that their view of women is just as high as their view of men.